The democratization and socialization of photography has brought about among the most fascinating changes in visual communication since man began smearing primitive inks on the walls of caves. To really understand the entire impact we must go back a couple of years. In the early days of photography cameras were huge, heavy boxes and Photographic negatives were made from glass, which were heavy and hard to transport. Taking a photo of something has been no small effort. Due to the time, effort and expenditure, photographers were fairly selective about the photographs they took. When families chose to get their picture taken it cost plenty of money, at least in comparative terms, and folks dressed up for the event.
Over the years the price of photography came down along with the camera lens captured more of our ordinary lives and selves. From the time movie started coming out in rolls mistakes were less expensive in terms of effort and cost. Photographers found they could take and check the results of instagram private account viewer. No more did people will need to sit down wide-eyed immobility lest they float during the shot. Now photographers can shoot dozens of frames from different angles, searching for only one unique view.
In the transition to electronic even the meagre Cost of getting the film Processed in a lab was no longer required. There was no technical artwork to be concerned about; shooting pictures became as easy as pushing a button. And did we ever begin pushing that button. We took a lot of pictures People did not even need to bother carrying a camera; we wanted that camera to be part of our mobile phone. Pretty soon the camera has been a part of each moment of everyone’s lives. The cave walls were replaced by the Facebook wall and the whole world could see a photo of what we had for lunch. We became bombarded with visual stimulation and at precisely the exact same time how we as audiences valued that stimulation changed as well.
Now there’s been a subtle but profound change in photography. The Question is no longer if it is possible to take compelling pictures, but if you can make your images rise above a living visual flooding. Today eyes equal cash and people who have the ability to attract eyes to their images are people who can reap gains. Whether this fascination is through technical excellence and complex photography ability or pure, dumb luck is no more relevant, although one can argue that using the photographic ability raises your odds of getting that shot. Luck has a propensity to prefer the skilful and ready. If you wish to be a professional photographer, a big part of the job is figuring out how to distinguish your work from a sea of images.